Surgical outcomes following mitral valve surgery

Objective: To report the surgical outcomes after mitral valve surgery at Songklanagarind Hospital Material and Methods: The medical records of all patients who underwent mitral valve surgery between January 2001 and December 2003 at Songklanagarind Hospital were reviewed. The following data was exam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR) 2005-06, Vol.23 (3), p.131-136
Hauptverfasser: C Rergkliang, A Chetpaophan, V Chittithavorn, P Vasinanukorn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To report the surgical outcomes after mitral valve surgery at Songklanagarind Hospital Material and Methods: The medical records of all patients who underwent mitral valve surgery between January 2001 and December 2003 at Songklanagarind Hospital were reviewed. The following data was examined: preoperative clinical characteristics, echocardiographic reports, operative technique, postoperative course and short-term clinical outcomes. Results: There were 122 patients, with a mean age of 38.17 ± 15.73 years (range 10-72 years). The New York Heart Association classes (NYHA class) I, II, III and IV were 2 (1.6%), 36 (29.5%), 57 (46.7%) and 27 (22.1%), respectively. 1M.D., Assist. Prof., 2M.D. Lecture Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand Seventy-one patients (58.2%) had atrial fibrillation and 51 (41.8%) had sinus rhythm. Mitral stenosis was predominant in our patients (53.3%), and the most common etiology was rheumatic heart disease (84.4%). Mitral valve replacement was the most common procedure (64.8%). The 30-day mortality rate was 2.4% (3 patients). The mean follow-up was 10.89 ± 5.08 months (range 4-32 months) and there were 2 deaths during follow-up. Most of the survivors were in NYHA class I (85%). Conclusion: We achieved a good surgical outcome in mitral valve surgery from our initial experience.
ISSN:2586-9981
2630-0559