154 Universal synthetic spike-in controls for accurate adaptive immune receptor profiling

BackgroundThe results of adaptive immune receptor (AIR) repertoire diversity assays can be affected by various biases from differences in conditions in the RT-PCR and NGS sequencing steps. Spike-in synthetic controls can be used as calibration standards to address these biasesMethodsIn this study, w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 2023-11, Vol.11 (Suppl 1), p.A174-A174
Hauptverfasser: Chenchik, Alex, Liu, Tianbing, Makhanov, Mikhail, Hu, Dongfang, Diehl, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundThe results of adaptive immune receptor (AIR) repertoire diversity assays can be affected by various biases from differences in conditions in the RT-PCR and NGS sequencing steps. Spike-in synthetic controls can be used as calibration standards to address these biasesMethodsIn this study, we synthesized near full-length BCR and TCR constructs that mimic seven different IGH, IGK, IGL, TRB, TRA, TRG and TRD genes. To test our spike-in controls, three sets of variants at different concentrations were added to the RNA samples before the reverse transcription reaction with Cellecta’s DriverMap™ Adaptive Immune Receptor (AIR) Profiling Assay. The DriverMap™ protocol uses reverse gene-specific primers with unique molecular identifiers (UMI), allowing UMI-based correction of amplification biases during data analysisResultsCalculating UMI-based correction and comparing that with spike-in controls enabled us to differentiate between real and background sequences and estimate the average sequencing error rate at 0.4%-0.8% per base, which is within the reported range of Illumina sequencing.ConclusionsThis suggests that our spike-in controls are reliable and may be used as a universal tool to correct AIR protocol biases and calculate error and mutation rates in different AIR profiling assays.
ISSN:2051-1426
DOI:10.1136/jitc-2023-SITC2023.0154