Autoregressive Times Series Methods for Time Domain Astronomy

Celestial objects exhibit a wide range of variability in brightness at different wavebands. Surprisingly, the most common methods for characterizing time series in statistics—parametric autoregressive modeling—are rarely used to interpret astronomical light curves. We review standard ARMA, ARIMA, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in physics 2018-08, Vol.6
Hauptverfasser: Feigelson, Eric D., Babu, G. Jogesh, Caceres, Gabriel A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Celestial objects exhibit a wide range of variability in brightness at different wavebands. Surprisingly, the most common methods for characterizing time series in statistics—parametric autoregressive modeling—are rarely used to interpret astronomical light curves. We review standard ARMA, ARIMA, and ARFIMA (autoregressive moving average fractionally integrated) models that treat short-memory autocorrelation, long-memory 1/fα “red noise,” and nonstationary trends. Though designed for evenly spaced time series, moderately irregular cadences can be treated as evenly-spaced time series with missing data. Fitting algorithms are efficient and software implementations are widely available. We apply ARIMA models to light curves of four variable stars, discussing their effectiveness for different temporal characteristics. A variety of extensions to ARIMA are outlined, with emphasis on recently developed continuous-time models like CARMA and CARFIMA designed for irregularly spaced time series. Strengths and weakness of ARIMA-type modeling for astronomical data analysis and astrophysical insights are reviewed.
ISSN:2296-424X
2296-424X
DOI:10.3389/fphy.2018.00080