Analysis of Internal Angle Error of UAV LiDAR Based on Rotating Mirror Scanning
UAV LiDAR is a powerful tool for rapidly acquiring ground-based 3D spatial information and has been used in various applications. In addition to the ranging mechanism, the scanning method is also an important factor, affecting the performance of UAV LiDAR, and the internal angle error of LiDAR will...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | UAV LiDAR is a powerful tool for rapidly acquiring ground-based 3D spatial information and has been used in various applications. In addition to the ranging mechanism, the scanning method is also an important factor, affecting the performance of UAV LiDAR, and the internal angle error of LiDAR will seriously affect its measurement accuracy. Starting from the rotary scanning model of a single-sided mirror, this paper presents a comparative study of the characteristics of 45° single-sided mirror scanning, polygon prism scanning, polygon tower mirror scanning, and wedge mirror scanning. The error sources of the quadrangular tower mirror scanning are analyzed in detail, including the angle deviation between the direction of emitted laser and the rotation axis (typical 0.13 ± 0.18° and 0.85° ± 0.26°), the angle deviation between the mirror’s reflection plane and the rotation axis, and the surface angle deviation between multiple surfaces (typical ± 0.06°). As a result, the measurement deviation caused by the internal angle error can be as high as decimeter to meter, which cannot be fully compensated by simply adjusting the installation angle between the UAV and the LiDAR. After the calibration of the internal angle error, the standard deviation of the elevation difference between the point cloud and the control point is only 0.024 m in the flight experiment at 300 m altitude. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2072-4292 2072-4292 |
DOI: | 10.3390/rs14205260 |