Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence III: Benchmarking Retrieval Methods and Sensor Characteristics for Proximal Sensing

The interest of the scientific community on the remote observation of sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has increased in the recent years. In this context, hyperspectral ground measurements play a crucial role in the calibration and validation of future satellite missions. For this reason,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.962
Hauptverfasser: Cendrero-Mateo, M Pilar, Wieneke, Sebastian, Damm, Alexander, Alonso, Luis, Pinto, Francisco, Moreno, Jose, Guanter, Luis, Celesti, Marco, Rossini, Micol, Sabater, Neus, Cogliati, Sergio, Julitta, Tommaso, Rascher, Uwe, Goulas, Yves, Aasen, Helge, Pacheco-Labrador, Javier, Alasdair Mac Arthur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The interest of the scientific community on the remote observation of sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has increased in the recent years. In this context, hyperspectral ground measurements play a crucial role in the calibration and validation of future satellite missions. For this reason, the European cooperation in science and technology (COST) Action ES1309 OPTIMISE has compiled three papers on instrument characterization, measurement setups and protocols, and retrieval methods (current paper). This study is divided in two sections; first, we evaluated the uncertainties in SIF retrieval methods (e.g., Fraunhofer line depth (FLD) approaches and spectral fitting method (SFM)) for a combination of off-the-shelf commercial spectrometers. Secondly, we evaluated how an erroneous implementation of the retrieval methods increases the uncertainty in the estimated SIF values. Results show that the SFM approach applied to high-resolution spectra provided the most reliable SIF retrieval with a relative error (RE) ≤6% and
ISSN:2072-4292
2072-4292
DOI:10.3390/rs11080962