Coronary Collateral Circulation: A New Predictor of Mortality in Heart Transplant Recipients With Allograft Vasculopathy

Coronary collateral arteries (CCAs) are anastomotic channels between vessels; although beneficial in atherosclerosis, their role in heart transplantation (HT) recipients is underinvestigated. CCAs initially develop as microcirculation and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), promoting immune-depend...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation direct 2023-05, Vol.9 (5), p.e1470-e1470
Hauptverfasser: Civieri, Giovanni, Masiero, Giulia, Osto, Elena, Gambino, Antonio, Angelini, Annalisa, Fraiese, Angela, Fedrigo, Marny, Toscano, Giuseppe, Bottio, Tomaso, Perazzolo Marra, Martina, Iliceto, Sabino, Gerosa, Gino, Tona, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Coronary collateral arteries (CCAs) are anastomotic channels between vessels; although beneficial in atherosclerosis, their role in heart transplantation (HT) recipients is underinvestigated. CCAs initially develop as microcirculation and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), promoting immune-dependent proliferative angiogenic response, and play a role in their development. In our hypothesis, ischemia induced by coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) triggers the development of CCAs, which are, in turn, less functional as affected by CAV themselves. One hundred twenty-one patients receiving HT at our institution were retrospectively evaluated and were included if transthoracic echocardiography with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) assessment and coronary angiography were performed. CMD was defined as CFVR of ≤2.5. Patients with CAV were enrolled, and their angiograms were reviewed to evaluate the presence of CCAs. Cardiovascular mortality was assessed as the main clinical outcome. Forty patients were found to have CCAs. Patients with CCAs have lower CFVR than those without CCAs (2.22 ± 0.72 versus 2.69 ± 0.92;  = 0.003), reflecting in different rates of CMD in the 2 groups (72.5% versus 37%;  
ISSN:2373-8731
2373-8731
DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001470