Successes, Failures and Suggested Future Directions for Ecosystem Restoration of the Middle Sacramento River, California

Large-scale ecosystem restoration projects seldom undergo comprehensive evaluation to determine project effectiveness. Consequently, there are missed opportunities for learning and strategy refinement. Before our study, monitoring information from California's middle Sacramento River had not be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:San Francisco estuary and watershed science 2013, Vol.11 (3), p.1-29
Hauptverfasser: Golet, Gregory, Brown, David, Carlson, Melinda, Gardali, Thomas, Henderson, Adam, Holl, Karen, Howell, Christine, Holyoak, Marcel, Hunt, John, Kondolf, Mathias, Larsen, Eric, Luster, Ryan, McClain, Charles, Nelson, Charles, Paine, Seth, Rainey, William, Rubin, Zan, Shilling, Fraser, Silveira, Joseph, Swagerty, Helen, Williams, Neal, Wood, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Large-scale ecosystem restoration projects seldom undergo comprehensive evaluation to determine project effectiveness. Consequently, there are missed opportunities for learning and strategy refinement. Before our study, monitoring information from California's middle Sacramento River had not been synthesized, despite restoration having been ongoing since 1989. Our assessment was based on the development and application of 36 quantitative ecological indicators. Our synthesis demonstrates good progress in the restoration of riparian habitats, birds and other wildlife, but not in restoration of streamflows and geomorphic processes. Our progress assessment presents a compelling case for what needs to be done to further advance the ecological restoration of the river. The most important actions to be taken relate to promoting river meander and floodplain connectivity, and restoring components of the natural flow regime.
ISSN:1546-2366
1546-2366
DOI:10.15447/sfews.2013v11iss3art11