Trajectory Tracking Control of an Aerial Manipulator in the Presence of Disturbances and Model Uncertainties

The precise control of an aerial manipulator presents a formidable challenge due to the inherent mobility of its base, which is subject to both external disturbances and dynamic disturbances due to manipulator motions. In this paper, we introduce two Closed-Loop Inverse Kinematics (CLIK) control alg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied sciences 2024-03, Vol.14 (6), p.2512
Hauptverfasser: Pedrocco, Mattia, Pasetto, Alberto, Fanti, Giulio, Benato, Alberto, Cocuzza, Silvio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The precise control of an aerial manipulator presents a formidable challenge due to the inherent mobility of its base, which is subject to both external disturbances and dynamic disturbances due to manipulator motions. In this paper, we introduce two Closed-Loop Inverse Kinematics (CLIK) control algorithms tailored to aerial manipulators. The first algorithm operates at the velocity level and uses the Generalized Jacobian for inverse kinematics, while the second one operates at the acceleration level. We evaluate their performance in a simulated environment, replicating real-world challenges such as the wind effect, sensors noise, uncertainty of the system inertial parameters, and impulsive forces at the end-effector. Trajectory tracking simulated experiments are carried out for a two- and three-degree-of-freedom (DOF) aerial manipulator tracking a circular trajectory with its end-effector. Both algorithms demonstrate promising results in coping with external disturbances and variations in the inertial parameters, enhancing the precision of the trajectory tracking control. The acceleration-level algorithm shows overall better performance compared to the velocity-level one in the face of greater implementation complexity and computational burden.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app14062512