Oblique insertion of a straight cage during single level TLIF procedure proves to be non-inferior in terms of restoring segmental lordosis

With increasing relevance of the postoperative spinopelvic alignment, achieving optimal restoration of segmental lordosis (SL) during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has become increasingly important. However, despite the easier insertion of the straight cage, its potential to restore...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain & spine 2021, Vol.1, p.100302-100302, Article 100302
Hauptverfasser: Truckenmueller, Peter, Czabanka, Marcus, Bayerl, Simon H., Mertens, Robert, Vajkoczy, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:With increasing relevance of the postoperative spinopelvic alignment, achieving optimal restoration of segmental lordosis (SL) during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has become increasingly important. However, despite the easier insertion of the straight cage, its potential to restore SL is still considered inferior to the preferred insert-and-rotate technique with a banana-shaped cage. To determine, if simple oblique insertion of a straight cage allows for an equally effective restoration of SL, but reduces risk for intraoperative cage subsidence requiring revision surgery. The authors retrospectively identified 81 patients who underwent single-level TLIF between 11/2017-03/2020. 40 patients were included in the straight cage group, 41 patients in the banana cage group. The authors determined pre- and postoperative SL from plain lateral radiographs. Bone density was analyzed on computed tomographs using Hounsfield unit (HU) values. Both cage types were equally effective in restoring SL. However, 7.3% in the banana cage group, but none in the straight cage group, had to undergo revision surgery due to intraoperative cage subsidence. This was related to reduced bone density with lower HU values. With an extended dorsal release, the straight cage may be equally effective in restoring SL. Since no repositioning is needed after oblique insertion, the straight cage might cause less intraoperative endplate violation. Provided an adequate surgical technique, both cage types might be equally effective in restoring SL after one-level TLIF surgery. However, the straight cage might represent the safer alternative in patients with reduced bone quality. [Display omitted] •Straight cage in single-level TLIF equally effective in restoring segmental lordosis.•Straight cage might cause less revisions due to intraoperative cage subsidence.•Straight cage might be safer in patients with reduced bone quality.
ISSN:2772-5294
2772-5294
DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2021.100302