Targeted review of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for chlorfenapyr

In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) 396/2005, EFSA received a request from the European Commission to review the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for the non‐approved active substance chlorfenapyr in view of the possible lowering of the MRL set for tea. This current EU MRL is base...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:EFSA Journal 2023-12, Vol.21 (12), p.e8444-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Bellisai, Giulia, Bernasconi, Giovanni, Binaglia, Marco, Carrasco Cabrera, Luis, Castellan, Irene, Castoldi, Anna Federica, Chiusolo, Arianna, Chukwubike, Katia, Crivellente, Federica, Del Aguila, Monica, Ferreira, Lucien, Giner Santonja, German, Greco, Luna, Istace, Frederique, Jarrah, Samira, Lanzoni, Anna, Leuschner, Renata, Mangas, Iris, Martinez, Javier, Miron, Ileana, Nave, Stefanie, Panzarea, Martina, Parra Morte, Juan Manuel, Pedersen, Ragnor, Reich, Hermine, Ruocco, Silvia, Santos, Miguel, Scarlato, Alessia Pia, Terron, Andrea, Theobald, Anne, Tiramani, Manuela, Verani, Alessia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) 396/2005, EFSA received a request from the European Commission to review the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for the non‐approved active substance chlorfenapyr in view of the possible lowering of the MRL set for tea. This current EU MRL is based on an import tolerance established in 2007. EFSA reviewed the toxicological data assessed by other scientific bodies, proposing toxicological reference values to be used for an indicative risk assessment, noting that the values are affected by additional, non‐standard uncertainties. According to the indicative chronic and acute dietary risk assessment the existing MRL for tea does not pose an unacceptable risk for consumers. Further risk management discussions are required to decide which of the risk management options proposed by EFSA should be implemented in the EU MRL legislation.
ISSN:1831-4732
1831-4732
2314-9396
DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8444