Correlations in sleeping patterns and circadian preference between spouses
Spouses may affect each other’s sleeping behaviour. In 47,420 spouse-pairs from the UK Biobank, we found a weak positive phenotypic correlation between spouses for self-reported sleep duration (r = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.12) and a weak inverse correlation for chronotype (diurnal preference) (r = −0....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Communications biology 2023-11, Vol.6 (1), p.1156-14, Article 1156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Spouses may affect each other’s sleeping behaviour. In 47,420 spouse-pairs from the UK Biobank, we found a weak positive phenotypic correlation between spouses for self-reported sleep duration (r = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.12) and a weak inverse correlation for chronotype (diurnal preference) (r = −0.11; −0.12, −0.10), which replicated in up to 127,035 23andMe spouse-pairs. Using accelerometer data on 3454 UK Biobank spouse-pairs, the correlation for derived sleep duration was similar to self-report (r = 0.12; 0.09, 0.15). Timing of diurnal activity was positively correlated (r = 0.24; 0.21, 0.27) in contrast to the inverse correlation for chronotype. In Mendelian randomization analysis, positive effects of sleep duration (mean difference=0.13; 0.04, 0.23 SD per SD) and diurnal activity (0.49; 0.03, 0.94) were observed, as were inverse effects of chronotype (−0.15; −0.26, −0.04) and snoring (−0.15; −0.27, −0.04). Findings support the notion that an individual’s sleep may impact that of their partner, promoting opportunities for sleep interventions at the family-level.
Mendelian randomization analysis leveraging data from the UK Biobank and 23andMe, Inc., suggests that an individual’s sleep habits may impact those of their partner. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2399-3642 2399-3642 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s42003-023-05521-7 |