Cicaderma® in radiation–related dermatitis of breast cancer: Results from the multicentric randomised phase III CICA-RT
•This prospective study used Cicaderma® to prevent grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis.•The study did not show a superiority of Cicaderma® over routine practice skin care.•Less patients treated with Cicaderma® reported grade ≥ 2 pruritus. To prevent the occurrence of grade ≥ 2 radiodermatitis after post-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical and translational radiation oncology 2023-07, Vol.41, p.100647-100647, Article 100647 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •This prospective study used Cicaderma® to prevent grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis.•The study did not show a superiority of Cicaderma® over routine practice skin care.•Less patients treated with Cicaderma® reported grade ≥ 2 pruritus.
To prevent the occurrence of grade ≥ 2 radiodermatitis after post-operative breast irradiation in patients with non metastatic breast cancer.
This prospective randomised open-label multicenter study allocated patients from 3 French institutions, ≥18 years, requiring postoperative radiotherapy for histologically proven, early-stage (non-metastatic) unilateral breast adenocarcinoma or in situ breast cancer, with R0 or R1 post-operative status, to receive hygiene rules, associated with either Cicaderma® (Arm A), or preventive treatment according to the investigator preference (mainly hyaluronic acid (ialuset®), essential oils, or water spray, or no medication (Arm B). The primary outcome was to compare the efficacy of Cicaderma® versus local standard management in preventing the occurrence of grade ≥ 2 radiodermatitis. Main secondary objectives include Cicaderma® impact on radiotherapy discontinuation and on skin toxicity (pruritus), pain, quality of life, satisfaction.
The CICA-RT study enrolled from June 2020 to April 2021, 258 women with a median age of 61 (22–91) years in 3 institutions. Patients received either Cicaderma® (A: N = 130) or standard practice (B: N = 128). In the 123 patients who initiated radiotherapy in each arm, 95 (77%, 95%CI 68.8%–84.3%) patients did not develop grade ≥ 2 dermatitis. Sensitivity and per-protocol analyses confirmed the absence of differences between arms.
This prospective study did not meet its primary endpoint of superiority of Cicaderma® over routine practice skin care in terms of prevention of acute radioinduced dermatitis of grade 2 or higher. However, Cicaderma® showed a significant decrease in the occurrence of pruritus with less patients reporting at least once grade ≥ 2 pruritus (A: N = 38, 31%; B: N = 58, 47%; p = 0.009).
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04300829. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2405-6308 2405-6308 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100647 |