Comparative study between ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block and caudal epidural block anesthesia in children undergoing hypospadias surgery
Background The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block versus caudal epidural block as a part of multimodal analgesia in children undergoing hypospadias surgery. In this prospective, single-blinded study, 50 patients were randomized into...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ain-Shams journal of anesthesiology 2021-08, Vol.13 (1), p.1-8, Article 50 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block versus caudal epidural block as a part of multimodal analgesia in children undergoing hypospadias surgery.
In this prospective, single-blinded study, 50 patients were randomized into 2 groups (25 each group) either receiving ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block group A or caudal epidural block group B. In the pudendal nerve block group, patients were injected with 0.3 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 ug/kg fentanyl. In the caudal epidural group, patients were injected with 1 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 ug/kg fentanyl. Consumption of paracetamol was assessed during the first 24 h postoperatively. The “objective pain scale” done by Hannalah and Broadman was used to assess postoperative pain.
Results
This prospective randomized controlled single-blind clinical study was performed on total (50) ASA status I or II patients, of age 3 to 6 years scheduled for hypospadias surgery.
For the primary outcome, there was no statistically significant difference found between the two studied groups regarding objective pain score at arrival to PACU with
p
value = 1.000 while there was a statistically significant increase in pain score in group B than group A at 6 h and 12 h with
p
value = 0.017 and 0.003, respectively. Also, no statistically significant difference found between the two groups after 18 h with
p
value = 0.238 may be due to receiving acetaminophen dose in group B. Finally there was a statistically significant increase found in objective pain score in group B at 24 h than group A with
p
value = 0.015. And there was a statistically significant increase in time to first analgesia in group A than group B with
p
value < 0.001 while there was a statistically significant increase in total dose of acetaminophen in group B than group A with
p
value < 0.001.
Conclusion
Both ultrasound-guided pudendal block and caudal epidural block are effective and safe methods for postoperative analgesia for children undergoing hypospadias surgery but ultrasound-guided pudendal block gives more postoperative pain control. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2090-925X 1687-7934 2090-925X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s42077-021-00172-4 |