The der(1;7)(q10;p10) defining a distinct profile from −7/del(7q) in myelodysplastic syndromes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background and Objective Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis due to stem cell abnormalities. Monosomy 7q aberrations are a common cytogenetic abnormality in MDS. Specifically, an unbalanced translocation der(1;7)(q10;p10) [der(1;7)] has be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer medicine (Malden, MA) MA), 2024-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e6890-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Lang, Wei, Luo, Yingwan, Wang, Lu, Zhang, Yudi, Hu, Chao, Wang, Huanping, Tong, Hongyan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objective Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis due to stem cell abnormalities. Monosomy 7q aberrations are a common cytogenetic abnormality in MDS. Specifically, an unbalanced translocation der(1;7)(q10;p10) [der(1;7)] has been identified in MDS patients, which is a monosomy 7q aberration variant like −7/del(7q). However, knowledge of der(1;7)'s features remains limited. Existing studies have compared the clinical and genetic characteristics of der(1;7) to those of −7/del(7q) but yielded inconsistent findings. Accordingly, we conducted meta‐analyses comparing der(1;7) to −7/del(7q). Methods Publications were searched from the following databases up to January 10, 2023: Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Eligible studies were assessed for risks of bias. Relevant data were extracted from included studies and analyzed using random‐effects models. Publication bias was evaluated and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results The comparative meta‐analyses included 405 MDS patients with der(1;7) from nine studies. The analysis revealed that der(1;7) was associated with a greater male preponderance (86.1% vs. 68.3%, Odds Ratios (ORs) 2.007, p 
ISSN:2045-7634
2045-7634
DOI:10.1002/cam4.6890