The status of visiting graves in comparative jurisprudence

Attending the graves of the dead and, in other words, the dead, both righteous and corrupt, is one of the most controversial issues in Islamic jurisprudence. In such a way that different Islamic sects are sometimes placed together and the Imamiyyah and Sunni jurists have adopted a single opinion in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muṭālaʻāt-i fiqh va ḥuqūq-i Islāmī : dū faṣlnāmah-i ʻilmī, pizhūhishī pizhūhishī, 2023-07, Vol.15 (31), p.77-112
Hauptverfasser: sadegh Pishdad, Saeed Molavi Vardanjani, Mohsen Fahim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:per
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Attending the graves of the dead and, in other words, the dead, both righteous and corrupt, is one of the most controversial issues in Islamic jurisprudence. In such a way that different Islamic sects are sometimes placed together and the Imamiyyah and Sunni jurists have adopted a single opinion in line with each other; Although a part of the public has separated their way from other co-religionists here, they have moved towards the sanctity of the mentioned act and regarding the pilgrim as an idolater and an infidel. Of course, this does not mean that the fatwas of the jurists are dualistic, but the result of the detailed research and search in the jurisprudential and even theological sources of Imami and public thinkers shows the existence of four different theories in the debate. The writers, using descriptive-analytical methods and using library sources, think that the famous Imami and public jurists are right; it means that visiting the graves is permissible and desirable, but as long as there are no unnecessary actions and it is enough to attend the graves, read the Qur'an and supplication, and ask for forgiveness for the dead.
ISSN:2008-7012
2717-0330
DOI:10.22075/feqh.2022.24815.3058