Seasonal partitioning of precipitation between streamflow and evapotranspiration, inferred from end-member splitting analysis
The terrestrial water cycle partitions precipitation between its two ultimate fates: “green water” that is evaporated or transpired back to the atmosphere, and “blue water” that is discharged to stream channels. Measuring this partitioning is difficult, particularly on seasonal timescales. End-membe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrology and earth system sciences 2020-01, Vol.24 (1), p.17-39 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The terrestrial water cycle partitions precipitation
between its two ultimate fates: “green water” that is evaporated or
transpired back to the atmosphere, and “blue water” that is discharged to
stream channels. Measuring this partitioning is difficult, particularly on
seasonal timescales. End-member mixing analysis has been widely used to
quantify streamflow as a mixture of isotopically distinct sources, but
knowing where streamwater comes from is not the same as knowing where
precipitation goes, and this latter question is the one we seek to answer.
Here we introduce “end-member splitting analysis”, which uses isotopic
tracers and water flux measurements to quantify how isotopically distinct
inputs (such as summer vs. winter precipitation) are partitioned into
different ultimate outputs (such as evapotranspiration and summer vs. winter
streamflow). End-member splitting analysis has modest data requirements and
can potentially be applied in many different catchment settings. We
illustrate this data-driven, model-independent approach with publicly
available biweekly isotope time series from Hubbard Brook Watershed 3. A
marked seasonal shift in isotopic composition allows us to distinguish
rainy-season (April–November) and snowy-season (December–March)
precipitation and to trace their respective fates. End-member splitting
shows that about one-sixth (18±2 %) of rainy-season precipitation
is discharged during the snowy season, but this accounts for over half
(60±9 %) of snowy-season streamflow. By contrast, most (55±
13 %) snowy-season precipitation becomes streamflow during the rainy
season, where it accounts for 38±9 % of rainy-season streamflow.
Our analysis thus shows that significant fractions of each season's
streamflow originated as the other season's precipitation, implying
significant inter-seasonal water storage within the catchment as both
groundwater and snowpack. End-member splitting can also quantify how much of
each season's precipitation is eventually evapotranspired. At Watershed 3,
we find that only about half (44±8 %) of rainy-season precipitation
evapotranspires, but almost all (85±15 %) evapotranspiration
originates as rainy-season precipitation, implying that there is relatively
little inter-seasonal water storage supplying evapotranspiration. We show
how results from this new technique can be combined with young water
fractions (calculated from seasonal isotope cycles in precipitation and
streamflow) and new water fractions (calculated |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1607-7938 1027-5606 1607-7938 |
DOI: | 10.5194/hess-24-17-2020 |