Early onset of efficacy with erenumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine

Background Subcutaneous erenumab reduced monthly migraine days and increased the likelihood of achieving a ≥ 50% reduction at all monthly assessment points tested in 2 pivotal trials in episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). Early efficacy of migraine preventive medications is an importan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of headache and pain 2018-10, Vol.19 (1), p.92-92, Article 92
Hauptverfasser: Schwedt, Todd, Reuter, Uwe, Tepper, Stewart, Ashina, Messoud, Kudrow, David, Broessner, Gregor, Boudreau, Guy P., McAllister, Peter, Vu, Thuy, Zhang, Feng, Cheng, Sunfa, Picard, Hernan, Wen, Shihua, Kahn, Joseph, Klatt, Jan, Mikol, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Subcutaneous erenumab reduced monthly migraine days and increased the likelihood of achieving a ≥ 50% reduction at all monthly assessment points tested in 2 pivotal trials in episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). Early efficacy of migraine preventive medications is an important treatment characteristic to patients. Delays in achievement of efficacy can result in failed adherence. The objective of these post-hoc analyses were to evaluate efficacy in the first 4 weeks after initial subcutaneous administration of erenumab 70 mg, erenumab 140 mg, or placebo. Methods There is no generally accepted methodology to measure onset of action for migraine preventive medications. We used a comprehensive approach with data from both studies to evaluate change from baseline in weekly migraine days (WMD), achievement of ≥ 50% reduction in WMD, and proportion of patients experiencing migraine measured on a daily basis. The 7-day moving averages were overlaid with observed data. Results In both studies (EM: N  = 955; CM: N  = 667), there was evidence of onset of efficacy of erenumab vs. placebo during the first week of treatment, which in some cases reached nominal significance. For EM the changes in WMD were (least squares mean [LSM] [95% CI]): placebo, − 0.1 (− 0.3, 0.0); erenumab 70 mg, − 0.3 (− 0.5, − 0.2) p  = 0.130; erenumab 140 mg, − 0.6 (− 0.7, − 0.4) p  
ISSN:1129-2369
1129-2377
DOI:10.1186/s10194-018-0923-6