Deakin microgrid digital twin and analysis of AI models for power generation prediction

•Comparison of AI models for power generation using a university microgrid data.•Closeness spectrum, a novel metric for trade-off between consistency and accuracy of prediction methods.•Implementing power generation prediction for a digital twin for a university microgrid. [Display omitted] To achie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management. X 2023-04, Vol.18, p.100370, Article 100370
Hauptverfasser: Natgunanathan, Iynkaran, Mak-Hau, Vicky, Rajasegarar, Sutharshan, Anwar, Adnan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Comparison of AI models for power generation using a university microgrid data.•Closeness spectrum, a novel metric for trade-off between consistency and accuracy of prediction methods.•Implementing power generation prediction for a digital twin for a university microgrid. [Display omitted] To achieve carbon neutral by 2025, Deakin University launched a AUD 23 million Renewable Energy Microgrid in 2020 with a 7-megawatt solar farm, the largest at an Australian University. A web-based digital twin (DT) is developed to provide operators with intelligence and insights through several AI-driven capabilities. Accurate and computationally efficient power generation prediction is one of the critical elements in this DT. To this end, we researched the literature and identified the commonly used Machine Learning-based prediction models and compared them computationally using power generation and weather sensor data obtained from the solar farm. From the computational experiments, we find that, overall, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) has achieved the highest R2-score (0.944) and the lowest RMSE (14.848). To obtain further insights, we compared the methods using our two novel metrics, the x-percentile Closeness scores and the x-percentile Absolute error scores. The new metrics provide us with a spectrum to measure the consistency and robustness of the prediction methods instead of just a single value. Further, power generation can fluctuate substantially, and a prediction model should be accurate regardless of the magnitude of the output, hence measuring the relative error has its merits. By our two new metrics, using the data from our Deakin Microgrid, Random Forrest (RF) outperformed the other methods tested, with the smallest absolute relative error across the whole spectrum (from 0.011 to 0.457). RF is also the fastest in model training time at 4.894 s and XGBoost came second at 5.115 s–a big contrast to ANN at 144.102 s. All prediction times are under 1 s. RF is therefore used as a power prediction algorithm in our Deakin Microgrid Digital Twin.
ISSN:2590-1745
2590-1745
DOI:10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100370