Reconstructing metastatic seeding patterns of human cancers

Reconstructing the evolutionary history of metastases is critical for understanding their basic biological principles and has profound clinical implications. Genome-wide sequencing data has enabled modern phylogenomic methods to accurately dissect subclones and their phylogenies from noisy and impur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature communications 2017-01, Vol.8 (1), p.14114-14114, Article 14114
Hauptverfasser: Reiter, Johannes G., Makohon-Moore, Alvin P., Gerold, Jeffrey M., Bozic, Ivana, Chatterjee, Krishnendu, Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine A., Vogelstein, Bert, Nowak, Martin A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reconstructing the evolutionary history of metastases is critical for understanding their basic biological principles and has profound clinical implications. Genome-wide sequencing data has enabled modern phylogenomic methods to accurately dissect subclones and their phylogenies from noisy and impure bulk tumour samples at unprecedented depth. However, existing methods are not designed to infer metastatic seeding patterns. Here we develop a tool, called Treeomics, to reconstruct the phylogeny of metastases and map subclones to their anatomic locations. Treeomics infers comprehensive seeding patterns for pancreatic, ovarian, and prostate cancers. Moreover, Treeomics correctly disambiguates true seeding patterns from sequencing artifacts; 7% of variants were misclassified by conventional statistical methods. These artifacts can skew phylogenies by creating illusory tumour heterogeneity among distinct samples. In silico benchmarking on simulated tumour phylogenies across a wide range of sample purities (15–95%) and sequencing depths (25-800 × ) demonstrates the accuracy of Treeomics compared with existing methods. Tumours frequently metastasize to multiple anatomical sites and understanding how these different metastases evolve may be important for therapy. Here, the authors develop a method—Treeomics—that can construct phylogenies from multiple metastases from next-generation sequencing data.
ISSN:2041-1723
2041-1723
DOI:10.1038/ncomms14114