Nurse‐led group information for patients with breast cancer: Equal to individual information? A comparative study

Aim To investigate outpatients with breast cancer perception of information before and after changed informational practice. Design The design was a comparative study. Method Information about breast cancer treatment and chemotherapy toxicity changed from individual to nurse‐led group information. W...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nursing open 2021-01, Vol.8 (1), p.423-433
Hauptverfasser: Dieperink, Karin Brochstedt, Ellegaard, Elisabeth, Astrup, Anja Langkjær, Hasse, Henriette Tind, Elnegaard, Caroline Matilde, Jensen, Jeanette Dupont
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To investigate outpatients with breast cancer perception of information before and after changed informational practice. Design The design was a comparative study. Method Information about breast cancer treatment and chemotherapy toxicity changed from individual to nurse‐led group information. Women with early‐stage breast cancer were eligible. To evaluate individual versus group information, the patients completed a questionnaire at their third cycle of chemotherapy, including Knowledge of treatment, Support from healthcare professionals or peers and general self‐efficacy Ability to act in everyday life. The study is registered in OSF https://osf.io/bh7wg. Results In total, 90 participants in two groups were included: (a) individual information (N = 44) and (b) group information (N = 46). Groups were comparable in age and educational level. Both groups found the information satisfactory, with no significant differences regarding perceived knowledge or support. Five of ten questions in self‐efficacy showed significantly better outcomes in patients receiving group information but with no difference in overall self‐efficacy. Group information was non‐inferior compared with individual information. Patients were satisfied in both groups.
ISSN:2054-1058
2054-1058
DOI:10.1002/nop2.643