Bioethics and “The Most Important of the Least Important Things”
The paper considers the validity of cheating in sports and the consequences of such practices, especially in football. The focus of the research is, first of all, the controversial thesis of some philosophers that cheating can make the sport more dynamic and attractive to the audience and thus indir...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pannoniana 2022-12, Vol.6 (1), p.35-52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The paper considers the validity of cheating in sports and the consequences of such practices, especially in football. The focus of the research is, first of all, the controversial thesis of some philosophers that cheating can make the sport more dynamic and attractive to the audience and thus indirectly generate greater benefits to its stakeholders. The authors are of the opinion that cheating within any framework of ‘flexibility’ of the rules cannot be (bio)ethically justified or morally acceptable since the idea of sports competition as such would be delegitimised. They then analyse in the text the specific act of cheating made by Thierry Henry in a match between France and the Republic of Ireland as part of the UEFA second round of qualification for the 2010 FIFA World Cup. The authors conclude that, by helping to score a goal on fraud and later refusing to admit his wrongdoing, the French striker derogated the constitutive rules of football and sportsmanship rules, violated the reference moral values in sport and the fair play dimension, and questioned the integrity of the activity itself, i.e., the game.
U radu se razmatra valjanost prevara u sportu kao i posljedice takvih postupaka. U fokusu istraživanja je, najprije, kontroverzna teza nekih filozofa da varanje može učiniti sport dinamičnijim i privlačnijim za publiku i time posredno donijeti veću do(bro)bit njegovim sudionicima. Autori su stajališta da varanje ni u kakvoj „fleksibilnosti” pravila sporta ne može biti bioetički opravdano niti moralno prihvatljivo, s obzirom da bi se time osporila ideja sportskog natjecanja kao takvog. Potom se analizira konkretan čin varanja koji je napravio Thierry Henry na uzvratnoj utakmici natjecanja za odlazak na Svjetsko prvenstvo u nogometu 2010. godine u Južnoj Africi između reprezentacije Francuske i reprezentacije Republike Irske. Zaključak je autora da je francuski napadač, pomažući da se na prevaru postigne gol i kasnijim odbijanjem priznavanja pogrešnosti vlastitog postupanja, derogirao konstitutivna pravila nogometa i pravila sportskog ponašanja, narušio referentne moralne vrijednosti u sportu i dimenziju fair-playa, te doveo u pitanje integritet same aktivnosti odnosno igre. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2459-7465 2459-6760 2459-7465 |
DOI: | 10.32903/p.6.1.2 |