Linked circadian outputs control elongation growth and flowering in response to photoperiod and temperature
Clock‐regulated pathways coordinate the response of many developmental processes to changes in photoperiod and temperature. We model two of the best‐understood clock output pathways in Arabidopsis , which control key regulators of flowering and elongation growth. In flowering, the model predicted re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular systems biology 2015-01, Vol.11 (1), p.776-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Clock‐regulated pathways coordinate the response of many developmental processes to changes in photoperiod and temperature. We model two of the best‐understood clock output pathways in
Arabidopsis
, which control key regulators of flowering and elongation growth. In flowering, the model predicted regulatory links from the clock to
CYCLING DOF FACTOR 1
(
CDF1
) and
FLAVIN‐BINDING, KELCH REPEAT, F‐BOX 1
(
FKF1
) transcription. Physical interaction data support these links, which create threefold feed‐forward motifs from two clock components to the floral regulator
FT
. In hypocotyl growth, the model described clock‐regulated transcription of
PHYTOCHROME‐INTERACTING FACTOR 4
and
5
(
PIF4
,
PIF5
), interacting with post‐translational regulation of PIF proteins by phytochrome B (phyB) and other light‐activated pathways. The model predicted bimodal and end‐of‐day PIF activity profiles that are observed across hundreds of PIF‐regulated target genes. In the response to temperature, warmth‐enhanced PIF4 activity explained the observed hypocotyl growth dynamics but additional, temperature‐dependent regulators were implicated in the flowering response. Integrating these two pathways with the clock model highlights the molecular mechanisms that coordinate plant development across changing conditions.
Synopsis
Crosstalk between the circadian clock and light/temperature signals controls seasonal plant development. Integrated mathematical models of the clock, flowering and elongation pathways identify new behaviours in light and temperature signalling.
CCA1 negatively regulates
FKF1
and
CDF1
transcription.
GI has an FKF1‐independent role in CDF1 protein stabilisation.
PIF proteins function throughout light:dark cycles.
Temperature regulates flowering time and hypocotyl elongation pathways at distinct times of day.
Graphical Abstract
Crosstalk between the circadian clock and light/temperature signals controls seasonal plant development. Integrated mathematical models of the clock, flowering and elongation pathways identify new behaviours in light and temperature signalling. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1744-4292 1744-4292 |
DOI: | 10.15252/msb.20145766 |