Review: Towards truly stall-free pork production?

•Pork producers have reduced reliance on stalls by adopting group gestation housing.•This review aimed to establish if stall-free pork production could be achieved.•Two stages were identified where stall removal would risk welfare and productivity.•Managing weaned sows presents fewer challenges and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal (Cambridge, England) England), 2024-06, Vol.18, p.101002, Article 101002
Hauptverfasser: Plush, K.J., Hewitt, R.J., D'Souza, D.N., van Barneveld, R.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Pork producers have reduced reliance on stalls by adopting group gestation housing.•This review aimed to establish if stall-free pork production could be achieved.•Two stages were identified where stall removal would risk welfare and productivity.•Managing weaned sows presents fewer challenges and so adoption will be faster.•Understanding space, pig and people experience will assist in stall-free farrowing. The individual housing of sows and boars within stalls is still frequent in commercial pork production, especially when the risk for impaired reproduction or welfare is high. Whilst many countries have either removed stall housing in gestation or are working towards this through the successful adoption of group housing, stalls are still used around weaning and mating and in farrowing crates for sows. In this review, we describe the stages in which stall use still occurs and why this is so, with the aim of determining whether stall-free pork production can realistically be achieved through successful industry adoption. Group housing during the period around weaning, oestrus and mating will present several issues such as sow aggression, riding and mounting. This will result in injuries and reduced reproductive performance for the animals, and an unsafe work environment for stock people if not adequately addressed. The second, most obvious stage of the reproductive cycle where stalls are used and removal would result in substantial detriment is in the farrowing crate, where associated high preweaning mortalities still plague both experimental and commercial outcomes. The use of temporary confinement has received renewed interest recently to reduce this mortality, but still involves the strategic use of a stall when piglets are at greatest risk of crushing. To transition towards complete removal of stalls around farrowing, we suggest that space allowance, in combination with animal and staff experience, are areas of opportunity. If the concerns identified during these two final reproductive stages can be addressed to limit poor animal welfare and productivity impacts, the use of stalls could be completely removed from pork production.
ISSN:1751-7311
1751-732X
1751-732X
DOI:10.1016/j.animal.2023.101002