Assessing streamflow and sediment responses to future climate change over the Upper Mekong River Basin: A comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 models

The Upper Mekong River Basin (UMRB), Southwest China. With climate change unfolding and climate change knowledge evolving over time, it is imperative to investigate whether the latest CMIP6 models offer enhanced utility in climate change impact studies compared to their predecessors. This study stre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology. Regional studies 2024-04, Vol.52, p.101685, Article 101685
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Di, Bai, Zhixu, Xu, Yue-Ping, Gu, Haiting, Gao, Chao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Upper Mekong River Basin (UMRB), Southwest China. With climate change unfolding and climate change knowledge evolving over time, it is imperative to investigate whether the latest CMIP6 models offer enhanced utility in climate change impact studies compared to their predecessors. This study strengthens the comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in assessing hydrological responses to future climate change. This was achieved utilizing the Soil and Water Assessment Tool, driven by downscaled CMIP5/CMIP6 model outputs under RCP8.5/SSP5–8.5. Both streamflow and sediment responses, encompassing the spatial and temporal changes, and the relationships between streamflow and sediment loads, were carefully evaluated and compared between CMIP5 and CMIP6. CMIP6 indicates a stronger warming in 2071–2100 over the UMRB compared to CMIP5. Mean annual precipitation/streamflow is projected to increase by 22.7%/26.3% using CMIP5 and 28.4%/34.4% using CMIP6. Mean annual sediment load changes, however, show a discrepancy between CMIP5 (−3.7%) and CMIP6 (+13.8%). CMIP6 exhibits larger inter-model variability in both climate and hydrological projections. Regarding future spatial distributions of mean annual water and sediment yields, a considerable agreement is demonstrated between CMIP5 and CMIP6, despite CMIP6 showing larger projections over most subbasins. Additionally, both ensembles exhibit approximate relationships between streamflow and sediment loads, indicating a comparable decline in watershed sediment generation and transport capacity under future climate change. Overall, CMIP6 suggests more severe climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment loads in the UMRB than CMIP5, highlighting the need to update climate change adaptation and mitigation policies based on the latest insights derived from CMIP6. [Display omitted] •CMIP6 projects greater climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment loads.•Larger inter-model variability is found in CMIP6 projections compared to CMIP5.•CMIP5 and CMIP6 show similar spatial patterns of water and sediment yields.•CMIP5 and CMIP6 indicate comparable changes in streamflow-sediment relationships.•Specific CMIP6 GCMs and their CMIP5 counterparts may not generate approximate projections.
ISSN:2214-5818
2214-5818
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101685