Self-Help Plus for refugees and asylum seekers: an individual participant data meta-analysis

QuestionRefugees and asylum seekers are at high risk of mental disorders due to various stressors before, during and after forceful displacement. The WHO Self-Help Plus (SH+) intervention was developed to manage psychological distress and a broad range of mental health symptoms in vulnerable populat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ mental health 2023-07, Vol.26 (1), p.e300672
Hauptverfasser: Karyotaki, Eirini, Sijbrandij, Marit, Purgato, Marianna, Acarturk, Ceren, Lakin, Daniel, Bailey, Della, Peckham, Emily, Uygun, Ersin, Tedeschi, Federico, Wancata, Johannes, Augustinavicius, Jura, Carswell, Kenneth, Välimäki, Maritta, van Ommeren, Mark, Koesters, Markus, Popa, Mariana, Leku, Marx Ronald, Anttila, Minna, Churchill, Rachel, White, Ross G, Al-Hashimi, Sarah, Lantta, Tella, Au, Teresa, Klein, Thomas, Tol, Wietse A, Cuijpers, Pim, Barbui, Corrado
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:QuestionRefugees and asylum seekers are at high risk of mental disorders due to various stressors before, during and after forceful displacement. The WHO Self-Help Plus (SH+) intervention was developed to manage psychological distress and a broad range of mental health symptoms in vulnerable populations. This study aimed to examine the effects and moderators of SH+ compared with Enhanced Care as Usual (ECAU) in reducing depressive symptoms among refugees and asylum seekers.Study selection and analysisThree randomised trials were identified with 1795 individual participant data (IPD). We performed an IPD meta-analysis to estimate the effects of SH+, primarily on depressive symptoms and second on post-traumatic stress, well-being, self-identified problems and functioning. Effects were also estimated at 5–6 months postrandomisation (midterm).FindingsThere was no evidence of a difference between SH+ and ECAU+ in reducing depressive symptoms at postintervention. However, SH+ had significantly larger effects among participants who were not employed (β=1.60, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.00) and had lower mental well-being levels (β=0.02, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.05). At midterm, SH+ was significantly more effective than ECAU in improving depressive symptoms (β=−1.13, 95% CI −1.99 to −0.26), self-identified problems (β=−1.56, 95% CI −2.54 to −0.59) and well-being (β=6.22, 95% CI 1.60 to 10.90).ConclusionsAlthough SH+ did not differ significantly from ECAU in reducing symptoms of depression at postintervention, it did present benefits for particularly vulnerable participants (ie, unemployed and with lower mental well-being levels), and benefits were also evident at midterm follow-up. These results are promising for the use of SH+ in the management of depressive symptoms and improvement of well-being and self-identified problems among refugees and asylum seekers.
ISSN:2755-9734
2755-9734
DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300672