Exercise and Rehabilitation in People With Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Systematic Review

To conduct a systematic review examining the effect of exercise and rehabilitation in people with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). The following databases were systematically searched: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process/ePubs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and Cumulative In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation 2022-06, Vol.4 (2), p.100189-100189, Article 100189
Hauptverfasser: Buryk-Iggers, Stephanie, Mittal, Nimish, Santa Mina, Daniel, Adams, Scott C., Englesakis, Marina, Rachinsky, Maxim, Lopez-Hernandez, Laura, Hussey, Laura, McGillis, Laura, McLean, Lianne, Laflamme, Camille, Rozenberg, Dmitry, Clarke, Hance
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To conduct a systematic review examining the effect of exercise and rehabilitation in people with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). The following databases were systematically searched: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process/ePubs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health. The final time point captured by the search is November 27, 2020. Eligible study designs included case-control, case-series, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, and intervention studies of structured exercise or rehabilitation interventions. Eligible populations included adults (18 years or older) with EDS (all subtypes) and hypermobility spectrum disorders. The search was restricted to articles published in English. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-RCTs. Reporting quality of RCTs was assessed using the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials statement with the harms extension. Reporting was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The search yielded 10 eligible studies including 330 participants. The study designs included 5 RCTs, 1 cohort, 2 single-arm interventions, 1 retrospective, and 1 feasibility study. All studies showed some improvement in a physical and/or psychological outcome after the intervention period. One adverse event (nonserious) potentially related to the intervention was reported. Of the 5 RCTs, 2 were rated as high quality with low risk of bias using PEDro, and the majority of non-RCTs were rated as critical risk of bias by ROBINS-I. The results suggest that exercise and rehabilitation may be beneficial for various physical and psychological outcomes. Adequately powered and rigorous RCTs of exercise and rehabilitation interventions for people with EDS are needed.
ISSN:2590-1095
2590-1095
DOI:10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100189