Comparative evaluation of iStent versus iStent inject W combined with phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma
The study aimed to compare the 12-month post-operative outcomes of iStent and iStent inject W (inject W), and the factors associated with their success in open-angle glaucoma. This single-center, retrospective comparative case series evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent iStent (co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-02, Vol.19 (2), p.e0297514-e0297514 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The study aimed to compare the 12-month post-operative outcomes of iStent and iStent inject W (inject W), and the factors associated with their success in open-angle glaucoma.
This single-center, retrospective comparative case series evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent iStent (comprising 1 stent) or inject W (comprising 2 stents) implantation with cataract surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma between January 2019 and March 2022. The 12-month post-operative efficacy outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medications, and survival analysis of the probability of success. "Failure" was defined as any of the following conditions compared to baseline: 1) IOP elevation, 2) increased glaucoma medication, or 3) IOP decline not exceeding 20% when glaucoma medication scores were comparable, and 4) need for additional glaucoma surgery. The safety outcomes included intra- and post-operative adverse events and changes in the best-corrected visual acuity and visual field.
The study comprised 55 eyes in the iStent and 105 in the inject W groups. At 12 months, treatment success was achieved in 66.0% of iStent and 78.4% of inject W eyes. The mean IOP was lower, and the percent reduction from baseline was equal in iStent-treated eyes (8.0% reduction, 14.8 mmHg to 13.7 mmHg, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0297514 |