Antenatal screening timeline and cutoff scores of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for predicting postpartum depressive symptoms in healthy women: a prospective cohort study

Background It is worthwhile to identify women at risk of developing postpartum depression during pregnancy. This study aimed to determine the optimal time and cutoff score for antenatal screening for prediction of postpartum depressive symptoms (PDS) using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (E...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2022-06, Vol.22 (1), p.1-527, Article 527
Hauptverfasser: Tanuma-Takahashi, Akiko, Tanemoto, Tomohiro, Nagata, Chie, Yokomizo, Ryo, Konishi, Akiko, Takehara, Kenji, Ishikawa, Tetsuo, Yanaihara, Nozomu, Samura, Osamu, Okamoto, Aikou
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background It is worthwhile to identify women at risk of developing postpartum depression during pregnancy. This study aimed to determine the optimal time and cutoff score for antenatal screening for prediction of postpartum depressive symptoms (PDS) using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and to identify risk factors for PDS. Methods The target population was healthy pregnant women receiving antenatal care at a university hospital in Tokyo, Japan. During the first, second, and third trimesters, 3-4 days postpartum, and one month postpartum, they were asked to take the Japanese version of the EPDS questionnaire. The primary outcome of the study was PDS, defined as an EPDS score [greater than or equai to] 9 at one month postpartum. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EPDS scores at each antenatal screening time were calculated. Results From 139 pregnant women, 129 were successfully followed up throughout the study. The number of women with an EPDS score [greater than or equai to] 9 during the first, second, and third trimesters, 3-4 days postpartum, and one month postpartum were 6/126 (4.8%), 9/124 (7.3%), 5/117 (4.3%), 17/123 (13.8%), and 15/123 (12.2%), respectively. Screening during the second trimester had the highest AUC to predict PDS (0.89) among antenatal screenings. The optimal EPDS cutoff score during the second trimester was 4/5 (sensitivity: 85.7%; specificity: 77.1%; PPV: 33.3%; NPV: 97.6%). An EPDS score [greater than or equai to] 5 during the second trimester (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 15.9; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 3.2-78.1) and a family history of mental illness (aOR: 4.5; 95%CI: 1.2-17.5) were significantly associated with PDS. Conclusions Our study suggests that the EPDS score at the second trimester with the cutoff value of 4/5 may be adequate for initial screening for prediction of PDS. Women with an EPDS score [greater than or equai to] 5 at the second trimester require more elaborate follow-up. Keywords: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Postpartum depression, Postpartum depressive symptoms, Screening, Cutoff, Prediction
ISSN:1471-2393
1471-2393
DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04740-w