Phenotypes in Gambling Disorder Using Sociodemographic and Clinical Clustering Analysis: An Unidentified New Subtype?

Gambling disorder (GD) is a heterogeneous disorder which has clinical manifestations that vary according to variables in each individual. Considering the importance of the application of specific therapeutic interventions, it is essential to obtain clinical classifications based on differentiated ph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in psychiatry 2019-03, Vol.10, p.173-173
Hauptverfasser: Jiménez-Murcia, Susana, Granero, Roser, Fernández-Aranda, Fernando, Stinchfield, Randy, Tremblay, Joel, Steward, Trevor, Mestre-Bach, Gemma, Lozano-Madrid, María, Mena-Moreno, Teresa, Mallorquí-Bagué, Núria, Perales, José C, Navas, Juan F, Soriano-Mas, Carles, Aymamí, Neus, Gómez-Peña, Mónica, Agüera, Zaida, Del Pino-Gutiérrez, Amparo, Martín-Romera, Virginia, Menchón, José M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Gambling disorder (GD) is a heterogeneous disorder which has clinical manifestations that vary according to variables in each individual. Considering the importance of the application of specific therapeutic interventions, it is essential to obtain clinical classifications based on differentiated phenotypes for patients diagnosed with GD. To identify gambling profiles in a large clinical sample of = 2,570 patients seeking treatment for GD. An agglomerative hierarchical clustering method defining a combination of the Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion and log-likelihood was used, considering a large set of variables including sociodemographic, gambling, psychopathological, and personality measures as indicators. Three-mutually-exclusive groups were obtained. Cluster 1 ( = 908 participants, 35.5%), labeled as "high emotional distress," included the oldest patients with the longest illness duration, the highest GD severity, and the most severe levels of psychopathology. Cluster 2 ( = 1,555, 60.5%), labeled as "mild emotional distress," included patients with the lowest levels of GD severity and the lowest levels of psychopathology. Cluster 3 ( = 107, 4.2%), labeled as "moderate emotional distress," included the youngest patients with the shortest illness duration, the highest level of education and moderate levels of psychopathology. In this study, the general psychopathological state obtained the highest importance for clustering.
ISSN:1664-0640
1664-0640
DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00173