Oviposition Preference of the Cabbage Root Fly towards Some Chinese Cabbage Cultivars: A Search for Future Trap Crop Candidates
The development of integrated pest management strategies becomes more and more pressing in view of potential harmful effects of synthetic pesticides on the environment and human health. A promising alternative strategy against is the use of trap crops. Chinese cabbage ( subsp. and subsp. ) is a high...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Insects (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2020-02, Vol.11 (2), p.127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The development of integrated pest management strategies becomes more and more pressing in view of potential harmful effects of synthetic pesticides on the environment and human health. A promising alternative strategy against
is the use of trap crops. Chinese cabbage (
subsp.
and subsp.
) is a highly sensitive Brassicaceae species previously identified as a good candidate to attract the cabbage root fly away from other crops. Here, we carried out multi-choice experiments both in the laboratory and in field conditions to measure the oviposition susceptibilities of different subspecies and cultivars of Chinese cabbages as compared to a broccoli reference. We found large differences among subspecies and cultivars of the Chinese cabbage, which received three to eleven times more eggs than the broccoli reference in field conditions. In laboratory conditions, the
subspecies did not receive more eggs than the broccoli reference. We conclude that
largely prefers to lay eggs on the
subspecies of Chinese cabbage compared to the
subspecies or broccoli. Some
cultivars, which received over ten times more eggs than broccoli in the field, appear especially promising candidates to further develop trap crop strategies against the cabbage root fly. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2075-4450 2075-4450 |
DOI: | 10.3390/insects11020127 |