Behavioral Outcomes Following Brain-Computer Interface Intervention for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Stroke is a leading cause of persistent upper extremity (UE) motor disability in adults. Brain-computer interface (BCI) intervention has demonstrated potential as a motor rehabilitation strategy for stroke survivors. This sub-analysis of ongoing clinical trial (NCT02098265) examines rehabilitative e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in neuroscience 2018-11, Vol.12, p.752-752
Hauptverfasser: Remsik, Alexander B, Dodd, Keith, Williams, Jr, Leroy, Thoma, Jaclyn, Jacobson, Tyler, Allen, Janerra D, Advani, Hemali, Mohanty, Rosaleena, McMillan, Matt, Rajan, Shruti, Walczak, Matt, Young, Brittany M, Nigogosyan, Zack, Rivera, Cameron A, Mazrooyisebdani, Mohsen, Tellapragada, Neelima, Walton, Leo M, Gjini, Klevest, van Kan, Peter L E, Kang, Theresa J, Sattin, Justin A, Nair, Veena A, Edwards, Dorothy Farrar, Williams, Justin C, Prabhakaran, Vivek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Stroke is a leading cause of persistent upper extremity (UE) motor disability in adults. Brain-computer interface (BCI) intervention has demonstrated potential as a motor rehabilitation strategy for stroke survivors. This sub-analysis of ongoing clinical trial (NCT02098265) examines rehabilitative efficacy of this BCI design and seeks to identify stroke participant characteristics associated with behavioral improvement. Stroke participants ( = 21) with UE impairment were assessed using Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and measures of function. Nine participants completed three assessments during the experimental BCI intervention period and at 1-month follow-up. Twelve other participants first completed three assessments over a parallel time-matched control period and then crossed over into the BCI intervention condition 1-month later. Participants who realized positive change (≥1 point) in total ARAT performance of the stroke affected UE between the first and third assessments of the intervention period were dichotomized as "responders" (
ISSN:1662-4548
1662-453X
1662-453X
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2018.00752