Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Results from a Large Single-institution Series

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with a Retzius-sparing approach is safe also in high-risk prostate cancer patients. It represents a valid alternative to standard RARP, allowing optimal cancer control and functional outcomes. Retzius-sparing (RS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy repre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology open science (Online) 2022-04, Vol.38, p.69-78
Hauptverfasser: Dell'Oglio, Paolo, Tappero, Stefano, Longoni, Mattia, Buratto, Carlo, Scilipoti, Pietro, Secco, Silvia, Olivero, Alberto, Barbieri, Michele, Palagonia, Erika, Napoli, Giancarlo, Strada, Elena, Petralia, Giovanni, Di Trapani, Dario, Vanzulli, Angelo, Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo, Galfano, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with a Retzius-sparing approach is safe also in high-risk prostate cancer patients. It represents a valid alternative to standard RARP, allowing optimal cancer control and functional outcomes. Retzius-sparing (RS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy represents a valid surgical treatment option for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the available evidence on the role of RS in high-risk (HR) PCa setting is sparse. To describe our RS technique for HR-PCa patients and to evaluate intra-, peri-, and postoperative oncological and functional outcomes. A total of 340 D’Amico HR-PCa patients underwent RS at a single high-volume centre between 2011 and 2020. Surgical procedures were performed by five experienced robotic surgeons. Complications were collected according to the standardised methodology proposed by the European Association of Urology guidelines. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated in patients with complete follow-up data (n = 320). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen values of ≥0.2 ng/ml. Urinary continence (UC) recovery was defined as the use of zero or one safety pad. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were performed. Fourteen patients (4%) experienced intraoperative complications and 52 90-d complications occurred in 44 patients (14%), of whom 24 had Clavien-Dindo 3a/b. Final pathology reported 49% International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 4–5, 55% ≥pT3a, and 28.8% positive surgical margins (PSMs; 9.4% focal and 19.4% extended PSMs). The median follow-up was 47 mo. Overall, 35.3% and 1.3% harboured BCR and died from PCa. At 4 yr of follow-up, BCR-free survival and additional treatment-free survival were 63.6% and 56.6%, respectively. ISUP 4–5 at biopsy (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6), prostate volume (OR: 1.03), partial or full nerve sparing (OR: 1.9), and full bladder neck preservation (OR: 2.2) were independent predictors of PSMs. Pathological ISUP 4–5 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.5) and PSMs (HR: 2.3) were independent predictors of BCR. Pathological ISUP 4–5 (HR: 1.5), PSMs (HR: 2.4), pT ≥3b (HR: 1.8), and pN ≥1 (HR: 1.8) were independent predictors of additional treatment. Immediate UC recovery was recorded in 53% patients. The 1- and 2-yr UC recovery and erectile function recovery were, respectively, 84% and 85%, and 43% and 50%. RS in HR-PCa patients allows optimal intra-, peri-, and postoperative outcomes. The
ISSN:2666-1683
2666-1691
2666-1683
DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.007