The effect of a visuospatial interference intervention on posttraumatic intrusions: a cross-over randomized controlled trial
: Intrusive memories form a core symptom of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Based on concepts of visuospatial interference and memory-updating accounts, technological innovations aim to attenuate such intrusions using visuospatial interventions. : This study aims to test the effect of a visuos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of psychotraumatology 2024, Vol.15 (1), p.2331402-2331402 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | : Intrusive memories form a core symptom of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Based on concepts of visuospatial interference and memory-updating accounts, technological innovations aim to attenuate such intrusions using visuospatial interventions.
: This study aims to test the effect of a visuospatial
-based intervention versus a verbal condition (
) and a never-targeted control (
) on intrusion frequency.
: A randomized crossover trial was conducted including
= 38 PTSD patients who had at least 3 distinct intrusive memories of trauma. After both 2 weeks (intervention 1) and 4 weeks (intervention 2), one of the three memories was randomly selected and either the visuospatial intervention (memory reminder of a traumatic memory +
) or verbal condition (reading a
article + answering questions) was performed on their first memory in randomized order. In the week 4 session, the patient conducted the other intervention condition on their second memory (crossover). The third memory was never targeted (
). Daily occurrence of intrusions over 8 weeks was collected using a diary and analysed using mixed Poisson regression models.
: Overall, there was no significant reduction in intrusion frequency from either intervention compared to each other, and to
control (relative risk
/
: 0.947;
= .31; relative risk
/
: 1.060;
= .15; relative risk
/
: 1.004;
= .92).
: There was no effect of either intervention on intrusions when administered in a crossover design where participants received both interventions. Design shortcomings and consequences for future studies are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2000-8066 2000-8198 2000-8066 |
DOI: | 10.1080/20008066.2024.2331402 |