The effect of a visuospatial interference intervention on posttraumatic intrusions: a cross-over randomized controlled trial

: Intrusive memories form a core symptom of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Based on concepts of visuospatial interference and memory-updating accounts, technological innovations aim to attenuate such intrusions using visuospatial interventions. : This study aims to test the effect of a visuos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of psychotraumatology 2024, Vol.15 (1), p.2331402-2331402
Hauptverfasser: Kehyayan, Aram, Thiel, Josephine P, Unterberg, Karl, Salja, Vanessa, Meyer-Wehrmann, Stefan, Holmes, Emily A, Matura, Jan-Martin, Dieris-Hirche, Jan, Timmesfeld, Nina, Herpertz, Stephan, Axmacher, Nikolai, Kessler, Henrik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:: Intrusive memories form a core symptom of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Based on concepts of visuospatial interference and memory-updating accounts, technological innovations aim to attenuate such intrusions using visuospatial interventions. : This study aims to test the effect of a visuospatial -based intervention versus a verbal condition ( ) and a never-targeted control ( ) on intrusion frequency. : A randomized crossover trial was conducted including  = 38 PTSD patients who had at least 3 distinct intrusive memories of trauma. After both 2 weeks (intervention 1) and 4 weeks (intervention 2), one of the three memories was randomly selected and either the visuospatial intervention (memory reminder of a traumatic memory + ) or verbal condition (reading a article + answering questions) was performed on their first memory in randomized order. In the week 4 session, the patient conducted the other intervention condition on their second memory (crossover). The third memory was never targeted ( ). Daily occurrence of intrusions over 8 weeks was collected using a diary and analysed using mixed Poisson regression models. : Overall, there was no significant reduction in intrusion frequency from either intervention compared to each other, and to control (relative risk / : 0.947;  = .31; relative risk / : 1.060;  = .15; relative risk / : 1.004;  = .92). : There was no effect of either intervention on intrusions when administered in a crossover design where participants received both interventions. Design shortcomings and consequences for future studies are discussed.
ISSN:2000-8066
2000-8198
2000-8066
DOI:10.1080/20008066.2024.2331402