Mechanistic validation of the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the assessment of diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Background The American Society for Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) 2016 guidelines for assessment of diastolic dysfunction (DD) are based primarily on the effects of diastolic dysfunction on left ventricular filling hemodynamics. However, these measures d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND 2020-10, Vol.18 (1), p.1-42, Article 42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background The American Society for Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) 2016 guidelines for assessment of diastolic dysfunction (DD) are based primarily on the effects of diastolic dysfunction on left ventricular filling hemodynamics. However, these measures do not provide quantifiable mechanistic information about diastolic function. The Parameterized Diastolic Filling (PDF) formalism is a validated theoretical framework that describes DD in terms of the physical properties of left ventricular filling. Aims We hypothesized that PDF analysis can provide mechanistic insight into the mechanical properties governing higher grade DD. Methods Patients referred for echocardiography showing reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< 45%) were prospectively classified into DD grade according to 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines. Serial E-waves acquired during free breathing using pulsed wave Doppler of transmitral blood flow were analyzed using the PDF formalism. Results Higher DD grade (grade 2 or 3, n = 20 vs grade 1, n = 30) was associated with increased chamber stiffness (261 [+ or -] 71 vs 169 [+ or -] 61 g/s.sup.2, p < 0.001), increased filling energy (2.0 [+ or -] 0.9 vs 1.0 [+ or -] 0.5 mJ, p < 0.001) and greater peak forces resisting filling (median [interquartile range], 18 [15-24] vs 11 [8-14] mN, p < 0.001). DD grade was unrelated to chamber viscoelasticity (21 [+ or -] 4 vs 20 [+ or -] 6 g/s, p = 0.32). Stiffness was inversely correlated with ejection fraction (r = - 0.39, p = 0.005). Conclusions Higher grade DD was associated with changes in the mechanical properties that determine the physics of poorer left ventricular filling. These findings provide mechanistic insight into, and independent validation of the appropriateness of the 2016 guidelines for assessment of DD. Keywords: Transthoracic echocardiography, Diastolic function, Pulsed-wave Doppler, Hemodynamics |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-7120 1476-7120 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12947-020-00224-z |