Alfaxalone improved in acute stress‐induced tactile hypersensitivity and anxiety‐like behavior in mice

Stress has been shown to affect brain activity and exert potent and complex modulatory effects on pain. Several behavioral tests have shown that acute stress produces hyperalgesia, depending on the stress conditions. In the present study, we investigated the effects of single restraint stress on the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychopharmacology reports 2022-06, Vol.42 (2), p.213-217
Hauptverfasser: Yoshizawa, Kazumi, Ukai, Saki, Kuroda, Junpei, Yamauchi, Tsugumi, Yamada, Daisuke, Saitoh, Akiyoshi, Iriyama, Satoshi, Nishino, Shoichi, Miyazaki, Satoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Stress has been shown to affect brain activity and exert potent and complex modulatory effects on pain. Several behavioral tests have shown that acute stress produces hyperalgesia, depending on the stress conditions. In the present study, we investigated the effects of single restraint stress on the tactile threshold and anxiety sensitivity in mice. Mice were evaluated for the tactile threshold using von Frey filaments and for anxiety sensitivity using the elevated plus maze (EPM) test. Tactile thresholds were lowered by both 2 and 4 hour of restraint stress, but anxiety‐like behaviors were observed only after 4 hour of restraint stress in the EPM test. In addition, we found that alfaxalone, which is a positive allosteric modulator of the γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor, prevented restraint stress‐induced hyperalgesia‐like and anxiety‐like behaviors. These results indicate that GABAergic function appears to be critical in the regulation of physical stress‐induced hyperalgesia and anxiety. Alfaxalone (3 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed the effects of restraint stress, as shown by a significant increase in both the tactile threshold and the percentage of time spent in the open arms of the EPM test.
ISSN:2574-173X
2574-173X
DOI:10.1002/npr2.12233