How do we use biologics in rheumatoid arthritis patients with a history of malignancy? An assessment of treatment patterns using Scandinavian registers

Correspondence to Katerina Chatzidionysiou; aikaterini.chatzidionysiou@ki.se Immune competence is of importance for the occurrence and outcome of malignancies, as exemplified by the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of malignancies.1 An increased risk for malignancies has been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases open 2020-09, Vol.6 (2), p.e001363
Hauptverfasser: Chatzidionysiou, Katerina, Delcoigne, Bénédicte, Frisell, Thomas, Hetland, Merete L, Glintborg, Bente, dreyer, lene, Cordtz, René, Zobbe, Kristian, Nordström, Dan, Trokovic, Nina, Aaltonen, Kalle, Provan, Sella Aarrestad, Grondal, Gerdur, Gudbjornsson, Bjorn, Askling, Johan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Correspondence to Katerina Chatzidionysiou; aikaterini.chatzidionysiou@ki.se Immune competence is of importance for the occurrence and outcome of malignancies, as exemplified by the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of malignancies.1 An increased risk for malignancies has been one of the main concerns since the introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory arthritis. The frequency of RA patients with a history of malignancy (according to the definition above) in each bDMARD group, as well as basic demographic and disease characteristics (age, gender, number of prior bDMARDs, years from cancer diagnosis until start of the bDMARD) was assessed across the different bDMARD groups. Whereas there was little variation across individual TNFi inhibitors ranging from 1% to 6%, the proportion of patients with a history of cancer at treatment start was higher among patients on non-anti-TNF bDMARDs, especially for rituximab (8–17%). [...]the small differences in median age among patients with history of cancer across the bDMARD groups under study supports the hypothesis that there is a preference for rituximab by clinicians for treatment of patients with history of cancer.
ISSN:2056-5933
2056-5933
DOI:10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001363