Evaluation of clinical parallel workflow in online adaptive MR-guided Radiotherapy: A detailed assessment of treatment session times

•This study investigates the impact of the clinical parallel workflow on the overall treatment session time in MRI-guided radiotherapy.•It identifies variations in the time taken for different oART steps across different anatomical sites.•The study also outlines the tasks performed by radiation ther...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology 2024-03, Vol.29, p.100239-100239, Article 100239
Hauptverfasser: Votta, Claudio, Iacovone, Sara, Turco, Gabriele, Carrozzo, Valerio, Vagni, Marica, Scalia, Aurora, Chiloiro, Giuditta, Meffe, Guenda, Nardini, Matteo, Panza, Giulia, Placidi, Lorenzo, Romano, Angela, Cornacchione, Patrizia, Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta, Boldrini, Luca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•This study investigates the impact of the clinical parallel workflow on the overall treatment session time in MRI-guided radiotherapy.•It identifies variations in the time taken for different oART steps across different anatomical sites.•The study also outlines the tasks performed by radiation therapist technologists (RTTs) within the CPW. Advancements in MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) enable clinical parallel workflows (CPW) for online adaptive planning (oART), allowing medical physicists (MPs), physicians (MDs), and radiation therapists (RTTs) to perform their tasks simultaneously. This study evaluates the impact of this upgrade on the total treatment time by analyzing each step of the current 0.35T-MRgRT workflow. The time process of the workflow steps for 254 treatment fractions in 0.35 MRgRT was examined. Patients have been grouped based on disease site, breathing modality (BM) (BHI or FB), and fractionation (stereotactic body RT [SBRT] or standard fractionated long course [LC]). The time spent for the following workflow steps in Adaptive Treatment (ADP) was analyzed: Patient Setup Time (PSt), MRI Acquisition and Matching (MRt), MR Re-contouring Time (RCt), Re-Planning Time (RPt), Treatment Delivery Time (TDt). Also analyzed was the timing of treatments that followed a Simple workflow (SMP), without the online re-planning (PSt + MRt + TDt.). The time analysis revealed that the ADP workflow (median: 34 min) is significantly (p 
ISSN:2405-6324
2405-6324
DOI:10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100239