Rhetorical structure of argumentative answer

The aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringa. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial statement was considered the central unit of the argumentative answer. Most of the writers held evidence relation between the central unit (nucleus) and the expansion (satellite). Evidence relation is interpersonal and the aim of the writers is to convince their addressees (in this case the compositions evaluation committee) that their point is correct. Within the initial statement, the relation with higher frequency was contrast. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet. In the higher level of the expansion text span, list is the most frequent relation because the applicants present various arguments with the same status. Contrast was the second relation with highest frequency in this same level. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet as it happened in the initial statement. Within the 15 compositions, 12 had a conclusion. This part was considered a satellite of the span formed by the initial statement and its expansion. The relation held was homonymous. Adapted from the source document