Decreased levels of interleukin-6 level in tears and clinical changes in subjects with moderate-to-severe infection corneal ulcers treated with platelet-rich fibrin lysate eye drops

PURPOSE: To assess the change of interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in tears and ocular clinical parameters in corneal ulcer patients with moderate-to-severe infection after adjunctive therapy with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) lysate-eyedrops compared with autologous serum eyedrops. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized double-blind controlled trial, which compared two groups of patients at Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta. A total of 42 patients (42 eyes) were divided into the control group (21 patients) and the intervention group (21 patients). All patients received antibacterial/antifungal therapy based on the etiology, and an adjunctive eyedrop therapy: autologous serum eyedrops for the control group and PRF lysate eyedrops for the intervention group. The IL-6 levels and clinical changes in patients, such as the area of corneal defects, pericorneal injection, and the level of blepharospasm were measured at the baseline, day 6, and day 13 after starting the treatment. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, the mean IL-6 level in day 13 decreased by 426.6 ± 665.4 pg/ml (P = 0.005) and 1283.7 ± 1569.1 pg/ml (P = 0.079) in the intervention and control groups, respectively. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.164). In term of corneal defect area, there was a significant decrease at day 6 and day 13 in both groups but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in all time points. Similarly, the proportion of blepharospasm and pericorneal injection severity appeared to improve especially on day 13 in both groups but were not statistically different between the two. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant decrease in IL-6 levels in the tears in patient using PRF lysate, but there was no significant difference when compared to those using autologous serum. The difference in defect area, degree of blepharospasm, and pericorneal injection was not statistically significant between the two treatment options.