A Simple and Inexpensive Method to Gain Diatom Absolute Abundances from Permanent Mounts in Hydrobiological and Paleoecological Research

Here, we describe and discuss a method based on microscopical field of view (FOV) area to estimate diatom absolute abundances (densities or concentrations), and we statistically verify its reliability, also comparing it to another commonly used method (microspheres). To test the new method, we purpo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied sciences 2023-05, Vol.13 (10), p.6019
Hauptverfasser: Cantonati, Marco, Cid-Rodríguez, María, Rossi, Floriana, Leira, Manel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Here, we describe and discuss a method based on microscopical field of view (FOV) area to estimate diatom absolute abundances (densities or concentrations), and we statistically verify its reliability, also comparing it to another commonly used method (microspheres). To test the new method, we purposely performed replicate counts, both with the FOV and with the microsphere method, on both subfossil and recent material (samples) from mires. Intraclass correlation (ICC) revealed a high degree of agreement between the measurements obtained for the replicates with each of the two methods, suggesting that both are reliable for measuring diatom valve concentrations. However, the FOV consistently overestimated diatom absolute abundances, as compared to the microsphere method, and the ICC value used to assess the reliability of the two methods combined suggested that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. The FOV method is relatively simple, has a lower cost, wider applicability, higher resolution, and warrants compatibility with existing datasets. However, there may also be drawbacks, such as the potential for sample distortion during the concentration process. Therefore, it is important to carefully evaluate the strengths and limitations of the different methods before adopting one for specific research or applied questions.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app13106019