Correlación entre las estrategias SITA Estándar 24 -2 y SITA Faster 24 -2 para evaluar el daño campimétrico en pacientes con Glaucoma Primario de Ángulo Abierto
INTRODUCTION: An ideal campimetry should ideally test all the intensities in all the locations, however, it has been found that it is not very practical to carry out tests with the different intensities and, sometimes, it is not even possible due to the limitations that they imply in the duration. S...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicina Clínica y Social 2021, Vol.5 (3), p.135-140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | INTRODUCTION: An ideal campimetry should ideally test all the intensities in all the locations, however, it has been found that it is not very practical to carry out tests with the different intensities and, sometimes, it is not even possible due to the limitations that they imply in the duration. SITA Standard strategies were used for more than two decades, but still seeking to improve time without losing quality, a new shorter strategy was created again, which they called the FASTER strategy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between the SITA Standard 24-2 and SITA Faster 24-2 strategies to evaluate the visual field damage in patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. METHODOLOGY: Analytical observational study. RESULTS: 74 visual field analysis results were analyzed using two techniques SITA Standard 24 - 2 and SITA Faster 24 - 2. The test time for the SITA Standard strategy was 379.64 ± 72.75 seconds and for the SITA strategy Faster 170.93 ± 49.17 (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2521-2281 |