Conocimiento y actitud sobre prácticas en farmacovigilancia de los profesionales farmacéuticos de farmacia comunitaria y farmacia hospitalaria en España
Background: The justification of the study was to assess the degree of knowledge of Spanish pharmacists in the field of Pharmacovigilance, their degree of notification of adverse drug reactions and their need for training, establishing the differences between community pharmacy pharmacist and those...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista española de salud pública 2020 (94) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: The justification of the study was to
assess the degree of knowledge of Spanish pharmacists
in the field of Pharmacovigilance, their degree of notification
of adverse drug reactions and their need for training,
establishing the differences between community pharmacy
pharmacist and those of hospital pharmacy.
Methods: A questionnaire with twelve questions on
Pharmacovigilance was designed. The distribution and collection
of the questionnaires were carried out via online
in collaboration with the Official Colleges of Pharmacists
and the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy during
the period from November 2018 to June 2019. The target
population were the pharmacists registered or belonging
to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy. The
results were processed using a descriptive and analytical
analysis. The qualitative variables were presented with
their frequency distribution and the quantitative with their
mean and standard deviation.
Results: 99% of hospital pharmacists said they had
evidence of suspected adverse reactions and 96.9% of
them ever reported. 73.5% of community pharmacists stated
that they had knowledge of suspected adverse reactions
but only 48.7% confirmed that they notified them. In general,
the pharmacists surveyed agreed on the importance of
Pharmacovigilance and believed that the quality of treatments
could be improved and the Spanish health system would be
saved if Pharmacovigilance was applied more.
Conclusions: Our results indicated that hospital pharmacists
report much more adverse drug reactions than community
pharmacist does. It also hospital pharmacists who
know best the obligations they have with Pharmacovigilance.
The surveyed pharmacists thought that the development of
actions in Pharmacovigilance would increase the adherence
of pharmaceutical professionals to the notification and would
imply improvements in the quality of treatments, the rational
use of medications and patient safety.
Fundamentos: La justificación del estudio fue evaluar
el grado de conocimiento de los farmacéuticos españoles
en el ámbito de la Farmacovigilancia, su grado
de notificación de Reacciones Adversas a Medicamentos
(RAM) y su necesidad de formación, estableciendo las diferencias
entre los farmacéuticos de farmacia comunitaria
(FC) y los de farmacia hospitalaria (FH).
Métodos: Se diseñó un cuestionario con doce preguntas
sobre Farmacovigilancia. La distribución y recogida
de los cuestionarios se realizo vía online con la colaboración
de l |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1135-5727 |