Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Octogenarian Patients. Long-term Results and Predictors of Poor Outcome
Background: Coronary percutaneous intervention in octogenarian patients is growing due to the rise in life expectancy. However, this population is underrepresented in randomized trials due to its high risk. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate short and long-term outcomes of coronary pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista Argentina de Cardiología 2018, Vol.86 (2), p.110-115 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Coronary percutaneous intervention in octogenarian patients is growing due to the rise in life expectancy. However, this population is underrepresented in randomized trials due to its high risk. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate short and long-term outcomes of coronary percutaneous intervention in octogenarian patients, and to identify independent predictors of adverse outcome. Methods: This was a retrospective study including consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at a general hospital from June 2011 to September 2013. Octogenarian patients (age ≥80 years) were compared with younger patients. Medical history, procedure characteristics and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE consisting of death, myocardial infarction or stroke) were evaluated at 1 month, and 1 and 3 years. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess independent predictors of adverse outcome. Results: A total of 1,030 patients (20.2% octogenarians) were included in the study. Mean age of octogenarian patients was 83 years (IQR 81-86). This population had more cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. No differences were observed in procedure success and number of implanted stents. The rate of MACE was significantly higher in octogenarian patients at 1 month (14.4% vs. 4.9%; p |
---|