Replication Data for: Muzzling the Media? Explaining Popular Support for Media Restrictions in Africa
Independent media are essential for democracy, but bring potential costs, including hate speech and false information. Many governments, including in Africa, are using such concerns to push new media restrictions. What arguments do Africans themselves find convincing? I use an original conjoint surv...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Independent media are essential for democracy, but bring potential costs, including
hate speech and false information. Many governments, including in Africa, are using
such concerns to push new media restrictions. What arguments do Africans
themselves find convincing? I use an original conjoint survey experiment in four
countries (Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda) to identify the effects of several
different potential justifications for media restrictions on popular attitudes. Contra
expectations, support for media restrictions does not seem attributable to government
supporters simply following leaders’ anti-media rhetoric, nor are concerns about foreign
influence via media impactful in most countries. Certain language, such as support for
armed groups and spreading hate speech, is especially likely to generate calls for
harsher responses. When coupled with observational survey data and focus group
evidence, these findings suggest that many Africans see media restrictions as
supportive of democracy, rather than as tools to empower already-entrenched leaders. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.7910/dvn/go75qe |