Rates and fractions (saturated and decreased ISRF and CR rates)
Similar to Ploeckinger & Schaye (2020) but with the following changes: - turbulence of 6km/s is added in the Cloudy calculations - turbulent pressure of 6 km/s is included in the calculation of the Jeans column density (pressure = max of turbulent and thermal pressure) - ISRF scales with the new...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Similar to Ploeckinger & Schaye (2020) but with the following changes:
- turbulence of 6km/s is added in the Cloudy calculations
- turbulent pressure of 6 km/s is included in the calculation of the Jeans column density (pressure = max of turbulent and thermal pressure)
- ISRF scales with the new Jeans column density (incl. turbulent pressure) but saturates at a column density of 1.3e22 cm-2 (corresponds to 100 pc turbulent Jeans length)
- cosmic ray rate scales with the new Jeans column density according to the Lacki et al. (2010) scaling (CR rate proportional to the column density) and saturates at a Milky Way value of 3.63e20 cm-2 (this is the log N_0 = 20.56 value used in PS20)
- both the CR rate and the ISRF are scaled down by 2 dex (1 dex more than in the fiducial model from PS20 for a given column density but note that the column densities are higher in the ISM due to the turbulent pressure contribution). |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.7910/dvn/brwnhj |