Concrete Crack Conglomerate Dataset

This dataset is the conglomeration of the cataloged crack datasets from the literature, making an extremely diverse crack dataset. There were over 10,995 images which have been merged from CFD (Shi, Cui, Qi, Meng, & Chen, 2016), Crack500 (Yang et al., 2020), CrackTree200 (Zou, Cao, Li, Mao, &...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Bianchi, Eric, Hebdon, Matthew
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Bianchi, Eric
Hebdon, Matthew
description This dataset is the conglomeration of the cataloged crack datasets from the literature, making an extremely diverse crack dataset. There were over 10,995 images which have been merged from CFD (Shi, Cui, Qi, Meng, & Chen, 2016), Crack500 (Yang et al., 2020), CrackTree200 (Zou, Cao, Li, Mao, & Wang, 2012), DeepCrack (Y. Liu, Yao, Lu, Xie, & Li, 2019), Eugen Miller (Yang et al., 2020), GAPs (Eisenbach et al., 2017), Rissbilder (Yang et al., 2020), non-crack (Dorafshan, Thomas, & Maguire, 2018), and Volker (Yang et al., 2020). The majority of pixels were in the background class at 97.2%, and a little over 2.8% were in the crack class. This was expected, since cracks take up only thin lines of space on most images. The images were resized to 512x512 for training and testing the DeeplabV3+ model. The original and resized images are included. The data was split 90% training, and 10% testing by randomly sorting the data. After training with the DeeplabV3+ model (DOI: 10.7294/16628596), we were able to receive approximately 70% accuracy for detecting concrete cracks in the image. More details of the training, the results, the dataset, and the code may be referenced in the journal article. The GitHub repository information may be found in the journal article.If you are using the dataset in your work, please include both the journal article and the dataset citation.
doi_str_mv 10.7294/16625056.v1
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_7294_16625056_v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_7294_16625056_v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_7294_16625056_v13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBA2NNAzN7I00Tc0MzMyNTA10ysz5GRQds7PSy5KLUlVcC5KTM5WAHLTc_JzU4sSgUIuiSWJxaklPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQdvNNcTZQzcFKJ-cWZIaX1CUmZtYVBlvaBAPsiIeZkV8maExaaoBqf8w1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Concrete Crack Conglomerate Dataset</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Bianchi, Eric ; Hebdon, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Eric ; Hebdon, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>This dataset is the conglomeration of the cataloged crack datasets from the literature, making an extremely diverse crack dataset. There were over 10,995 images which have been merged from CFD (Shi, Cui, Qi, Meng, &amp; Chen, 2016), Crack500 (Yang et al., 2020), CrackTree200 (Zou, Cao, Li, Mao, &amp; Wang, 2012), DeepCrack (Y. Liu, Yao, Lu, Xie, &amp; Li, 2019), Eugen Miller (Yang et al., 2020), GAPs (Eisenbach et al., 2017), Rissbilder (Yang et al., 2020), non-crack (Dorafshan, Thomas, &amp; Maguire, 2018), and Volker (Yang et al., 2020). The majority of pixels were in the background class at 97.2%, and a little over 2.8% were in the crack class. This was expected, since cracks take up only thin lines of space on most images. The images were resized to 512x512 for training and testing the DeeplabV3+ model. The original and resized images are included. The data was split 90% training, and 10% testing by randomly sorting the data. After training with the DeeplabV3+ model (DOI: 10.7294/16628596), we were able to receive approximately 70% accuracy for detecting concrete cracks in the image. More details of the training, the results, the dataset, and the code may be referenced in the journal article. The GitHub repository information may be found in the journal article.If you are using the dataset in your work, please include both the journal article and the dataset citation.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.7294/16625056.v1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University Libraries, Virginia Tech</publisher><subject>Bridge Inspection ; Concrete ; Crack ; Crack Detection ; Dataset ; Deep Learning ; Machine Learning ; Semantic Segmentation ; Structural Inspection</subject><creationdate>2021</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-9115-0279 ; 0000-0001-9003-1414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.7294/16625056.v1$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebdon, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Concrete Crack Conglomerate Dataset</title><description>This dataset is the conglomeration of the cataloged crack datasets from the literature, making an extremely diverse crack dataset. There were over 10,995 images which have been merged from CFD (Shi, Cui, Qi, Meng, &amp; Chen, 2016), Crack500 (Yang et al., 2020), CrackTree200 (Zou, Cao, Li, Mao, &amp; Wang, 2012), DeepCrack (Y. Liu, Yao, Lu, Xie, &amp; Li, 2019), Eugen Miller (Yang et al., 2020), GAPs (Eisenbach et al., 2017), Rissbilder (Yang et al., 2020), non-crack (Dorafshan, Thomas, &amp; Maguire, 2018), and Volker (Yang et al., 2020). The majority of pixels were in the background class at 97.2%, and a little over 2.8% were in the crack class. This was expected, since cracks take up only thin lines of space on most images. The images were resized to 512x512 for training and testing the DeeplabV3+ model. The original and resized images are included. The data was split 90% training, and 10% testing by randomly sorting the data. After training with the DeeplabV3+ model (DOI: 10.7294/16628596), we were able to receive approximately 70% accuracy for detecting concrete cracks in the image. More details of the training, the results, the dataset, and the code may be referenced in the journal article. The GitHub repository information may be found in the journal article.If you are using the dataset in your work, please include both the journal article and the dataset citation.</description><subject>Bridge Inspection</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Crack</subject><subject>Crack Detection</subject><subject>Dataset</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Semantic Segmentation</subject><subject>Structural Inspection</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYBA2NNAzN7I00Tc0MzMyNTA10ysz5GRQds7PSy5KLUlVcC5KTM5WAHLTc_JzU4sSgUIuiSWJxaklPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQdvNNcTZQzcFKJ-cWZIaX1CUmZtYVBlvaBAPsiIeZkV8maExaaoBqf8w1A</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Bianchi, Eric</creator><creator>Hebdon, Matthew</creator><general>University Libraries, Virginia Tech</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9115-0279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9003-1414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Concrete Crack Conglomerate Dataset</title><author>Bianchi, Eric ; Hebdon, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_7294_16625056_v13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bridge Inspection</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Crack</topic><topic>Crack Detection</topic><topic>Dataset</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Semantic Segmentation</topic><topic>Structural Inspection</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebdon, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bianchi, Eric</au><au>Hebdon, Matthew</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Concrete Crack Conglomerate Dataset</title><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>This dataset is the conglomeration of the cataloged crack datasets from the literature, making an extremely diverse crack dataset. There were over 10,995 images which have been merged from CFD (Shi, Cui, Qi, Meng, &amp; Chen, 2016), Crack500 (Yang et al., 2020), CrackTree200 (Zou, Cao, Li, Mao, &amp; Wang, 2012), DeepCrack (Y. Liu, Yao, Lu, Xie, &amp; Li, 2019), Eugen Miller (Yang et al., 2020), GAPs (Eisenbach et al., 2017), Rissbilder (Yang et al., 2020), non-crack (Dorafshan, Thomas, &amp; Maguire, 2018), and Volker (Yang et al., 2020). The majority of pixels were in the background class at 97.2%, and a little over 2.8% were in the crack class. This was expected, since cracks take up only thin lines of space on most images. The images were resized to 512x512 for training and testing the DeeplabV3+ model. The original and resized images are included. The data was split 90% training, and 10% testing by randomly sorting the data. After training with the DeeplabV3+ model (DOI: 10.7294/16628596), we were able to receive approximately 70% accuracy for detecting concrete cracks in the image. More details of the training, the results, the dataset, and the code may be referenced in the journal article. The GitHub repository information may be found in the journal article.If you are using the dataset in your work, please include both the journal article and the dataset citation.</abstract><pub>University Libraries, Virginia Tech</pub><doi>10.7294/16625056.v1</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9115-0279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9003-1414</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.7294/16625056.v1
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_7294_16625056_v1
source DataCite
subjects Bridge Inspection
Concrete
Crack
Crack Detection
Dataset
Deep Learning
Machine Learning
Semantic Segmentation
Structural Inspection
title Concrete Crack Conglomerate Dataset
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T06%3A20%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Bianchi,%20Eric&rft.date=2021&rft_id=info:doi/10.7294/16625056.v1&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_7294_16625056_v1%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true