Concrete Crack Conglomerate Dataset
This dataset is the conglomeration of the cataloged crack datasets from the literature, making an extremely diverse crack dataset. There were over 10,995 images which have been merged from CFD (Shi, Cui, Qi, Meng, & Chen, 2016), Crack500 (Yang et al., 2020), CrackTree200 (Zou, Cao, Li, Mao, &...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This dataset is the conglomeration of the cataloged crack
datasets from the literature, making an extremely diverse crack dataset. There
were over 10,995 images which have been merged from CFD (Shi, Cui, Qi, Meng,
& Chen, 2016), Crack500 (Yang et al., 2020), CrackTree200 (Zou, Cao, Li,
Mao, & Wang, 2012), DeepCrack (Y. Liu, Yao, Lu, Xie, & Li, 2019), Eugen
Miller (Yang et al., 2020), GAPs (Eisenbach et al., 2017), Rissbilder (Yang et
al., 2020), non-crack (Dorafshan, Thomas, & Maguire, 2018), and Volker
(Yang et al., 2020). The majority of pixels were in the background class at
97.2%, and a little over 2.8% were in the crack class. This was expected, since
cracks take up only thin lines of space on most images. The images were resized
to 512x512 for training and testing the DeeplabV3+ model. The original and
resized images are included. The data was split 90% training, and 10% testing
by randomly sorting the data. After training with the DeeplabV3+ model (DOI: 10.7294/16628596),
we were able to receive approximately 70% accuracy for detecting concrete
cracks in the image. More details of the training, the results, the dataset,
and the code may be referenced in the journal article. The GitHub repository
information may be found in the journal article.If you are using the dataset in your work, please include both the journal article and the dataset citation. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.7294/16625056.v1 |