Comparative analysis between quenching and partitioning versus quenching and tempering for SAE 4340
ABSTRACT A new heat treatment has been recently researched, whose denomination is quenching and partitioning (Q&P), in order to stabilize the retained austenite in the microstructure of steels. Initially, this treatment was carried out on high-silicon-steels, although, its potential reaches othe...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACT A new heat treatment has been recently researched, whose denomination is quenching and partitioning (Q&P), in order to stabilize the retained austenite in the microstructure of steels. Initially, this treatment was carried out on high-silicon-steels, although, its potential reaches other materials with low alloys containing nickel or manganese. The same is done to perform a quenching between the initial (Ms) and final (Mf) temperatures of martensitic transformation, followed by a reheating to a isothermal stage over a period of time. In this work, the Q&P was conducted on SAE 4340 steel, austenitized at 870 ° C for 30 min, then quenching in polymer up to 240 ° C and partitioned into three different times: 10 s, 30 s, and 90 s. Also, a quenching and tempering (TR) treatment was conduct on the same material to evaluate and compare the microstructures and mechanical properties obtained in both processes, through optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction (XRD), as well as Vickers microhardness tests. A complex microstructure was observed in the samples from Q&P, unlike TR specimens. From the XRD, indications was obtained that the time of 30 s for the partitioning process was the most effective in stabilizing the retained austenite. Added to this, the high hardness reached, 696HV1. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.6084/m9.figshare.9870815 |