Additional file 1: of Creating customized oral stents for head and neck radiotherapy using 3D scanning and printing

Additional file 1: of Creating customized oral stents for head and neck radiotherapy using 3D scanning and printing

Figure S1 A flowchart compares the workflow for the two tested methods; CT images segmentation versus 3D scanning. Figure S2 Unpaired t-test shows a significant advantage for the 3D scanning method compared to CT derived segmentation in terms of reproducibility measured by the average dice coefficie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zaid, Mohamed, Nimit Bajaj, Burrows, Hannah, Mathew, Ryan, Dai, Annie, Wilke, Christopher, Palasi, Stephen, Hergenrother, Ryan, Chung, Caroline, Fuller, Clifton, Phan, Jack, G. Gunn, Morrison, William, Garden, Adam, Frank, Steven, Rosenthal, David, Andersen, Michael, Adegbenga Otun, Chambers, Mark, Koay, Eugene
Format: Video
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Biochemistry
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Developmental Biology
Evolutionary Biology
FOS: Biological sciences
Genetics
Medicine
Molecular Biology
Space Science
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Figure S1 A flowchart compares the workflow for the two tested methods; CT images segmentation versus 3D scanning. Figure S2 Unpaired t-test shows a significant advantage for the 3D scanning method compared to CT derived segmentation in terms of reproducibility measured by the average dice coefficient for the 3 observers. Figure S3 Unpaired t-test shows a significant advantage for the ICP registration method over the manual one in terms of time efficiency. (PPTX 54 kb)
DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.9692342