Relative performance of different methods with regard to the test set and novel set on GO biological process terms (size 101 to 300)

The relative performance of individual groups differs between the test set and novel set. In addition, the performance on the novel set was generally worse than on the test set. This indicates that cross-validation should be used carefully in assessing the relative performance of different algorithm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Yuanfang Guan, Myers, Chad L, Hess, David C, Barutcuoglu, Zafer, Caudy, Amy A, Troyanskaya, Olga G
Format: Bild
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The relative performance of individual groups differs between the test set and novel set. In addition, the performance on the novel set was generally worse than on the test set. This indicates that cross-validation should be used carefully in assessing the relative performance of different algorithms and that evaluation on novel biology is necessary. Asterisks indicate second round submissions. GO, Gene Ontology.Copyright information:Taken from "Predicting gene function in a hierarchical context with an ensemble of classifiers"http://genomebiology.com/2008/9/S1/S3Genome Biology 2008;9(Suppl 1):S3-S3.Published online 27 Jun 2008PMCID:PMC2447537.
DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.84708